my case 2/95
keywords:
ASCII Architecture
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 1995 15:42:01 CST
Sender: DESIGN-L "Basic and applied design" (Art and Architecture)
From: carr0023@gold.tc.umn.edu
Subject: my case
X-To: fraker@mailbox.mail.umn.edu (Dean of U of MN, CALA)
> if you doubt everything
> you believe in nothing
>
> no rationality for reasoning
o
objective /|\ subjective
---------- / \ -----------
true/false one right/wrong
individual
______________________
| u |
| |
| o
| objective /|\ subjective
| ---------- /|\ -----------
| true/false 3|E right/wrong
| |
| | human being
|____________________| subject one
human animal described
with scientific method
ie. behaviorism, stats
-human representation-
as mathematical object
the one, two and three
_________________________
if one is unnable to include the | |
realm of science which recognizes | |
space, atomic to o |
universal, as objective |\ subjective |
_the_ objective ---------- |\ ----------- |
rationality, and true/false 3|E right/wrong |
to reason from this "common" | |
vantage, one is limited in their | human being |
abilities to use what is known as |_______one subject_____|
True, and what is known as False:
____h_u_m_a_n_i_t_i_e_s____
|s||c||i||e||n||c||e|| u |
|||||||||||||||||||||| |
|||||||||||||||||||||o |
|||||objective||||||||\ subjective |
||||||||||||||||||||||\ ----------- |
|||||xxxx/xxxxx|||||||E right/wrong |
|||||||||||||||||||||| |
|||||||||||||||||||||| relative truth/falsity |
||||||||||||||||||||||_based_on_ones_beliefs___| or doubt.
science is NOT common to humans, nor
does it exert any influence over our
human actions or our human willing. instead, the universe of science
is seen as a "choice" and personal
"objectivity" arbitrarily exists,
and does not require justification.
_________________________________________________________________________
| ___h_u_m_a_n__a_n_i_m_a_l__ Universe|
| O B J E C T I V E | 1 | |
| | "being" | |
| R A T I O N A L I Z A T I O N | \o/ | |
| | | | |
| O F | / \ | |
| 3|E | |
| N A T U R E | personal universe | |
| | individuals Competing | |
| S C I E N T I F I C |~~personal~~objectivity~~| |
|_______________________________________________________________________|
____h_u_m_a_n__a_s__G_o_d__
| PRIVATE |
| |
o |
|\ subjective |
"science" |\ ----------- |
3|E right/wrong |
| ~true/false |
| |
|~~personal~~objectivity~~|
_________________________________________________________________________
| ___h_u_m_a_n__a_n_i_m_a_l__ Universe|
| O B J E C T I V E | private| |
| | "being" subject| |
| R A T I O N A L I Z A T I O N | \o/ and | |
| | | :their:| |
| O F | / \ :truth:| |
| OBJECTIVE THOUGHT3|EOBJECTIVE THOUGHT WITH- | |
| N A T U R E | OUT COMMON TRUTH--used | |
| | in the form of methods | |
| S C I E N T I F I C |~of~personal~objectivity~| |
|_______________________________________________________________________|
_________________________________________________________________________
| ___h_u_m_a_n__a_n_i_m_a_l__ Universe|
| O B J E C T I V E | private | |
| | "being" | |
| R A T I O N A L I Z A T I O N | \o/ | |
| | | | |
| O F | / \ | |
| 3|E "Scientific Method" | |
| N A T U R E | co-opted uncritically | |
| | judged without truth-- | |
| S C I E N T I F I C |but personal subjectivity| |
|_________________________________|judges, a private truth |___________|
|which cannot be reasoned |
|with because it does not |
|"believe" the rational is|
|the "right" truth, nor is|
|a "public" thing, rather |
|a "private" individuals |
|interpretation and with- |
and this "space" |out the ability to reason|
|the truth of the truth as|
between |it exists in the public |
|mind, but not in the mind|
architecture and |of the private university|
|of public ideas. Thus, |
science |this is the case against | this gap
|individual rights to act |
|with public intention and|
can be filled |as result, being treated |
|as only an animal, and to|
by recognizing |behave private authority |
|over the public mind, |
the objective truth of |this is my case._________| science.
For it is our public knowledge of
nature, and its objectivity enlarging
the subjective understanding of the
question of what is--
And this question pertains to both Science and the Humanities,
it can be enframed-- if it is within the abilities of the public
to do so-- or will the continued use of the "scientific ethic"
continued to be used in the Humanities _without_ a truth/falsity,
but instead, the private authority of minds, said public, which
equates the individual to one in the kingdom of animals, and this
competetive breed need behave, and believe in the Professors own
unconditional truths-- private science-- animal first-- human
second-- in this fitness testing-- and that, because of the idea
of doubt, and its impossible attempt at rationalizing past one's
private _value_ put _before_ the realities of what is realized in
public as true and false, that this- with critical deconstruction
of what comes first-- right/wrong or truth/false, will allow the
case of "private" limits, upon "public" truths, and that- this-
in the public realm of public ideas and thought--
is against the law.
And that no amount of reasoning will work-- for if someone cannot
recognize what is known as true, nor will accept the rational
approach to these matters, but rather use techniques of behavior
and of private authority over the freedoms of an individual, and
other individuals, over freedom of public mind and sense, and
the case can be made of "private limits" on "public freedoms",
and that this _must_ be changed, once acknowledged, for it is
wrong-- against the public value, and freedom of the public mind.
> the objective world is true
>
> this not false truth is science
> science is also of culture
>
> said two cultures- cp snow
>
> humanities and science
>
> subjective and objective
This is the public realm of thought, rationality and reasoning.
There exists Public Subjectivity-- in the idea of Science
There exists Public Objectivity -- in the idea of Architecture
Consider the idea of one, two, and three in the present nature,
in the Humanities, and of objective rationalization and reasoning..
Ideas of science, such as relativity, used without objective truth,
or rather, private values intervening previous to considering the
subjective quality of these non-personal public truths...
A/1 B/2 C/3
o o o
/|\ /|\ /|\
/ \ / \ / \
sub/obj sub/obj sub/obj
r/w|t/f r/w|t/f r/w|t/f
one two three
___________________________________________________________________________
if truth is relative, and there is no objective truth, there is no public.
____________________________________________________________________________
=/=
A B =/= 3
shared- =/=
o belief o =/= o
/|\ <---system----> /|\ =/= /|\
/ \ secular / \ =/= / \
=/=
subjective/object subjective/object =/= objective subjectivity
right/wrong = right/wrong =/= true/false
relative-truth = relative-truth =/= right/wrong
one = two =/= three
=/=
human difference =/= the common condition
=/=
Private Beliefs =/= Public Knowledge (history)
_____________________________________________=/=____________________________
\ the scientific ethic / the human ethic
\__________________________________________/
It is also a question as to whether you, an individual must first-
recognize yourself as a human animal.. then as a human being, and
an individual with free will. If so, then history is unimportant,
and surival and obedience to others in this system comes with the
assumption that by obedience you are being a human with free will
and not a trained animal by inhuman actions upon the individuals
freedoms to believe themself a human being first- then to realize
the objective truth that the human exists as does everything else
in nature-- we are humans first- or we are nothing and dead.
_________________________________________________________________________
| nature of |
| 1 2 3 objective |
| -science- |
| o o o |
| /|\ /|\ /|\ |
| / \ / \ / \ |
| |
| object object object |
| true/false true/false true/false |
| ^^^^ ^^^^ ^^^^ |
|_____________________the_objective_human_public________________________|
_________________________________________________________________________
| | nature of |
| A B | C subjective|
| | humanities|
| o o | o |
| /|\ /|\ | /|\ |
| / \ / \ | / \ |
| | |
| subject subject | subject |
| right/wrong right/wrong | right/wrong |
| ^^^^^ ^^^^^ | ^^^^^ |
|_______________the_improbability_of_reviving_a_public__________________|
-the loss of the individual right to think publically in education; paradox-
bc
Re: your mail 2/95