CoA/CAADRIA Roundtable
-
Summary
report of roundtable
Digital
Media – New Imperatives for Architectural Education
14 May 2005, CAADRIA
conference, Delhi, April 2005
Bharat
Dave <b.dave at unimelb dot edu dot au>
1. Introduction
The roundtable
discussion on integration of digital media in architectural studies
was initiated in response to request by Council of Architecture
(India). The initial discussion on this theme began via email to
selected educators and practitioners in India and around the world.
It invited responses to key questions faced by institutions
considering integration of IT in architectural curriculum. The
questions posed and responses received are attached at the end of
this report (Section 4). Additional relevant material from around the
world representing similar discussion from USA, Europe and Latin
America is attached in Section 5.
2. Summary of
roundtable discussion
Following the receipt
of email responses, a wide ranging discussion on integration of
digital media in architecture education programs took place as part
of the CAADRIA conference roundtable. The roundtable included a
number of delegates from many parts of the world and was attended by
both young and highly experienced academics and practitioners. Rather
than generating a singular position, the roundtable was aimed at
identifying most significant choices to be faced while integrating
digital media in architectural education.
The following key
guiding principles emerged from this discussion.
- Countries and
institutions that are relatively late starters in integrating IT in
architectural education should aim to leapfrog developments
elsewhere.
- Curricula should
aim to go beyond imparting skills in specific software to new ways
of thinking about architectural design.
- Do not develop
curricula around specific software packages. Instead aim to build
them around design staff knowledgeable in appropriate use of IT in
design.
- Use of IT in
architectural education should be seen in the context of wider
design curriculum. For example, IT integration in design education
may enable ways to redesign and integrate a range of design-related
subject materials in building construction, sustainability, building
performance, etc.
- Instead of ‘teaching’ software packages, the underlying principles
and reasoning in a given topic ought to be emphasized. For example,
fundamental introduction to geometric operations and composition
ought to take precedence over what given software ‘supports’
in terms of user functionality.
- As far as
possible, adopt extensible software and introduce students how to
develop software extensions using scripting and/or programming
interfaces. The underlying motive is not to train designers as
programmers but to allow them to question and go beyond ‘accepted’
norms imposed or introduced by software developers.
- Avoid separating
IT-based subjects from other parts of design curriculum (at least in
the undergraduate studies).
- Develop a culture
of sharing both teaching and student resources and experiences
across institutions so that not everyone needs to reinvent the
wheel.
- With rapid changes
and developments that occur in the field, it is essential to
cultivate access to and participation in international literature
and events in the field.
- Different
institutions are likely to gravitate towards different visions. In a
country such as India with a large number of institutions, the
curricula may range from theory and research-centric schools on the
one end to skills and application-centric schools on the other end,
with many intermediate positions between these two poles.
- In light of the
above, national policies should be careful about privileging any one
position since they may have detrimental impacts on what otherwise
may be pragmatic needs of the profession or society in a given
context.
- IT integration may
offer support for flexible, individual learning styles and needs.
This may be especially relevant for continuing professional
education modules.
- Encourage closer
integration with professionb to benefit from practice-based
innovations in use of IT in design that sometimes move at a much
faster pace than what is possible within educational institutions.
- Good teachers are
fundamental to the introduction of IT in design.
- Develop a program
around beliefs and visions, not around technology.
3. Next steps
The above guiding
principles are recommended to Council of Architecture (India) for
development of future policies with regard to integration of digital
media in architecture curricula at undergraduate and higher studies.
The above principles do not offer prescriptive roadmaps for either
specific curriculum structures or resources needed. To translate
these principles in more definitive terms would be the next logical
step forward for CoA (India).
4. Initial
roundtable outline and responses received
The following message
was sent to a small ground of educators and practitioners prior to
the roundtable—
Initial roundtable outline by Bharat Dave
The responses received are attached in following—
5. Other relevant documents
The issues raised in this roundtable have been debated at other
international research and teaching institutions around the world. The
following three documents reflect views based on experiences in the
USA, Europe and Latin America.
-
PRINTABLE VERSION: CAADRIA Round Table: Digital Media – New Imperatives for Architectural Education (PDF FORMAT)
|
-
I am writing to you for input in a special
request CAADRIA has received from the Indian Council of Architecture
(CoA) which as a statutory body "regulates" architectural
education. CoA has asked CAADRIA "to recommend a roadmap ... on
the use of Information Technology in architectural education and
practice." In response to this request, Anand Bhatt- our host
for this year's conference in Delhi, has asked me to convene a
roundtable discussion to formulate CAADRIA's recommendations.
-
The topics/issues you described are all important and relevant for discussion. I personally don't have much to add unless we get into the details, which is where the conversation will really get interesting.
-
Instead of strictly following your guidelines for the discussion, I would like
to add few other suggestions for the discussion. I don't know much about schools
of architecture in India and my suggestions may be based on a wrong idea I have
from them. Those suggestions are actually based on the South-American context,
particularly the Brazilian schools.
-
One key principle is that teaching in Computer Aided Architectural Design should
be seen as an integral part of the process of educating designers. Attempts to
separate it off as some kind of technical training should be resisted. The
integration of digital techniques into different stages and aspects of the
design process has been a key element of research and development in the field,
and this whole-process and wide ranging approach should be reflected in any
forward looking policy.
-
Since there are a large number of schools of architecture in India, delivering
different levels of architectural education and with different goals, there
should be differentiation in the answers to each of the questions below.
-
Having gone through undergraduate education in India, and having been
significantly involved in computer-aided architectural design education in the
U.S., I bring a perspective that bridges both worlds.
-
Broad principles underpinning design computing education
-
As we teach our students how to freely conceptualize, develop concepts into
detail design and finally convert design into construction documentation, we
need to ensure that students master various computing tools to be able to do
each task.
|
|
-
Local resources
-
External links
|